Pjanic v. The Stop & Shop Supermarket Company LLC

S.D. New York

Pjanic v. The Stop & Shop Supermarket Company LLC

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided May 16, 2022·No. 1:22-cv-03833·Unknown

Opinion

ffusocspyy DOCUMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EVECTRONICALLY FILED | SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOCH. eg Ne UE oo a a (Sn am Sm el aa elle ge Se DATE FILED: □□ -|(P 7. SIBEL PJANIC See Plaintiff, -against- 22-cv-3833 (LAK) THE STOP & SHOP SUPERMARKET COMPANY LLC, et al., Defendants SeNS = one Nan owaret a Nate erate) eardaoten Sete ie Ks CS Sener

ORDER

LEWIS A. KAPLAN, District Judge. Jurisdiction is invoked pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332. The notice of removal fails adequately to allege the existence of subject matter jurisdiction because, perhaps among other things, it fails adequately to allege: O The citizenship of one or more natural persons. See, e.g., Sun Printing & Publishing Ass’n v. Edwards, 194 U.S. 377 (1904); Leveraged Leasing _ Administration Corp.v. PacifiCorp Capital, Inc., 87 F.3d 44 (2d Cir. 1996). w The citizenship of one or more corporations. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332(c)(1). 0 The citizenship of one or more partnerships. See Carden vy. Arkoma Assocs., 494 U.S. 195 (1990). The citizenship of one or more limited ay companies. See Handlesman v. Bedford Village Green Assocs. L.P., 213 F.3d 48, 52 (2d Cir. 2000). O The nature and citizenship of one or more business entities. O The timely removal of the action from state court. In addition, the notice has not be joined in by all defendants. Absent the filing, in each case,, on or before May 24, 2022, of an amended notice adequately alleging the existence of subject matter jurisdiction, this action will be remanded to the state court. SO ORDERED. Dated: May 16, 2022 ( 4 le Lewis A. Kaplan United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ffusocspyy DOCUMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EVECTRONICALLY FILED | SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOCH. eg Ne UE oo a a (Sn am Sm el aa elle ge Se DATE FILED: □□ -|(P 7. SIBEL PJANIC See Plaintiff, -against- 22-cv-3833 (LAK) THE STOP & SHOP SUPERMARKET COMPANY LLC, et al., Defendants SeNS = one Nan owaret a Nate erate) eardaoten Sete ie Ks CS Sener

ORDER

LEWIS A. KAPLAN, District Judge. Jurisdiction is invoked pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332. The notice of removal fails adequately to allege the existence of subject matter jurisdiction because, perhaps among other things, it fails adequately to allege: O The citizenship of one or more natural persons. See, e.g., Sun Printing & Publishing Ass’n v. Edwards, 194 U.S. 377 (1904); Leveraged Leasing _ Administration Corp.v. PacifiCorp Capital, Inc., 87 F.3d 44 (2d Cir. 1996). w The citizenship of one or more corporations. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332(c)(1). 0 The citizenship of one or more partnerships. See Carden vy. Arkoma Assocs., 494 U.S. 195 (1990). The citizenship of one or more limited ay companies. See Handlesman v. Bedford Village Green Assocs. L.P., 213 F.3d 48, 52 (2d Cir. 2000). O The nature and citizenship of one or more business entities. O The timely removal of the action from state court. In addition, the notice has not be joined in by all defendants. Absent the filing, in each case,, on or before May 24, 2022, of an amended notice adequately alleging the existence of subject matter jurisdiction, this action will be remanded to the state court. SO ORDERED. Dated: May 16, 2022 ( 4 le Lewis A. Kaplan United States District Judge

Pjanic v. The Stop & Shop Supermarket Company LLC, (S.D.N.Y. 2022).

Pincite

Pjanic v. The Stop & Shop Supermarket Company LLC (Pjanic v. The Stop & Shop Supermarket Company LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related