Pizzuto v. Smith

Fourth Circuit

Pizzuto v. Smith

584 F. App'x 181

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 20, 2014·No. No. 14-1534·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Carol L. Gray Pizzuto appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendations of the magistrate judge and denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Ac[182] cordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Pizzuto v. Smith, No. 5:12-cv-00149-FPS-JES (N.D.W. Va. July 1, 2013 & May 22, 2014). We deny Pizzuto’s motion to file electronic media. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Carol L. Gray Pizzuto appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendations of the magistrate judge and denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Ac[182] cordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Pizzuto v. Smith, No. 5:12-cv-00149-FPS-JES (N.D.W. Va. July 1, 2013 & May 22, 2014). We deny Pizzuto’s motion to file electronic media. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Pizzuto v. Smith, 584 F. App'x 181 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

584 F. App'x 181 (Pizzuto v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related