Pizzurro v. Kranzco Realty, Inc.

288 A.D.2d 4, 732 N.Y.S.2d 10, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10201
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 1, 2001·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Anne Targum, J.), entered on or about January 5, 2001, which denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

An issue of fact exists as to whether the alleged hole in the curb separating the walkway of defendant’s mall from its parking lot constituted a tripping hazard. Such issue is raised by evidence, including the affidavit of an engineer, that the dimensions of the hole, painted over in a manner that made it difficult to detect and located in a poorly lit area where people would be looking straight ahead into the parking lot for their car, created a hazard (see, Argenio v Metropolitan Transp. Auth., 277 AD2d 165). Concur — Sullivan, P. J., Rosenberger, Nardelli, Rubin and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pizzurro v. Kranzco Realty, Inc., 288 A.D.2d 4, 732 N.Y.S.2d 10, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10201 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

288 A.D.2d 4 (Pizzurro v. Kranzco Realty, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Narvaez v. 2914 Third Avenue Bronx, LLC
88 A.D.3d 500 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)