Pizzati v. Charles Ferran & Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Pizzati v. Charles Ferran & Co.

122 So. 729, 11 La. App. 328, 1929 La. App. LEXIS 563

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedMay 27, 1929

DocketNo. 10,503

StatusPublished

This text of 122 So. 729 (Pizzati v. Charles Ferran & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pizzati v. Charles Ferran & Co., 122 So. 729, 11 La. App. 328, 1929 La. App. LEXIS 563 (La. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

WESTERFIELD, J.

Plaintiff sues for commissions on steamship repair work, which he claims to have solicited and obtained for the defendant, in the course of his employment as a solicitor or “runner.”

The trial court found that he was entitled to the amount claimed in his petition, $604.40, and rendered judgment accordingly. Defendant has appealed.

The issue, which is one entirely of fact, is elaborately discussed by the learned judge, a quo, in his reasons for judgment. Without repeating here what was there said, or giving an independent analysis of the evidence, we deem it sufficient to say that we are in accord with the conclusions reached by the trial court, consequently the judgment appealed from must be and it is hereby affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WESTERFIELD, J.

Plaintiff sues for commissions on steamship repair work, which he claims to have solicited and obtained for the defendant, in the course of his employment as a solicitor or “runner.”

The trial court found that he was entitled to the amount claimed in his petition, $604.40, and rendered judgment accordingly. Defendant has appealed.

The issue, which is one entirely of fact, is elaborately discussed by the learned judge, a quo, in his reasons for judgment. Without repeating here what was there said, or giving an independent analysis of the evidence, we deem it sufficient to say that we are in accord with the conclusions reached by the trial court, consequently the judgment appealed from must be and it is hereby affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

122 So. 729, 11 La. App. 328, 1929 La. App. LEXIS 563, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pizzati-v-charles-ferran-co-lactapp-1929.