Pizarro-Garcia v. State

265 So. 3d 732
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 8, 2019
DocketCase No. 5D18-2518
StatusPublished

This text of 265 So. 3d 732 (Pizarro-Garcia v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pizarro-Garcia v. State, 265 So. 3d 732 (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment and sentence rendered against Jennymar Pizarro-Garcia (Appellant) after she entered guilty pleas on three criminal charges, but we remand on count five for correction of a scrivener's error. In count five, Appellant pled guilty *733to the unlawful use of a two-way communication device to facilitate the commission of a crime, in violation of section 934.215, Florida Statutes (2016). The judgment, however, erroneously cites to section 934.21, Florida Statutes (2016). On remand, the trial court is directed to correct the judgment.

AFFIRMED; REMANDED for correction of a scrivener's error.

ORFINGER, BERGER and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
265 So. 3d 732, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pizarro-garcia-v-state-fladistctapp-2019.