Pizana v. McDonough

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Pizana v. McDonough

926 So. 2d 426, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 3720, 2006 WL 658920

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 17, 2006·No. No. 1D05-6097·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the appellant’s response to the Court’s order of February 1, 2006, the Court has determined that the order on appeal is neither a final order, nor a nonfinal order appealable pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130. Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. In light of the dismissal, the appellant’s Motion for Expedited Proceedings, filed on January 24, 2006, is denied as moot.

ERVIN, WOLF, and BROWNING, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the appellant’s response to the Court’s order of February 1, 2006, the Court has determined that the order on appeal is neither a final order, nor a nonfinal order appealable pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130. Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. In light of the dismissal, the appellant’s Motion for Expedited Proceedings, filed on January 24, 2006, is denied as moot.

ERVIN, WOLF, and BROWNING, JJ., concur.

Pizana v. McDonough, 926 So. 2d 426, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 3720, 2006 WL 658920 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

926 So. 2d 426 (Pizana v. McDonough) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.