Pixley v. Winchell
7 Cow. 366
Opinion
"Without saying whether this writ is absolutely void, we are clear that it cannot be set aside at this stage of the cause. The defendant has taken a step, by which he is regularly in court, whether there be any process or not. We will not interfere, merely because the party acted in ignorance, that the process was void.
Motion denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pixley v. Winchell, 7 Cow. 366 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1827).
7 Cow. 366 (Pixley v. Winchell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Daley v. Dennis
137 Misc. 1 (New York County Courts, 1930)
Denovsky v. Bach
93 Misc. 472 (New York County Courts, 1916)
White v. Marshall
13 Ohio C.C. Dec. 376 (Cuyahoga Circuit Court, 1902)
Graham v. Cass Circuit Judge
66 N.W. 348 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1896)
The Monte A.
12 F. 331 (S.D. New York, 1882)
Moch v. Virginia Fire & Marine Ins.
10 F. 696 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Virginia, 1882)
Pardee v. Smith
27 Mich. 33 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1873)
Mooney v. Hudson River Railroad
3 Daly 105 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1869)
State ex rel. Curtis v. McCullough
3 Nev. 202 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1867)
Ballouhey v. Cadot
3 Abb. Pr. 122 (New York Supreme Court, 1866)
Hubbell & Curran v. Dana
9 How. Pr. 424 (New York Supreme Court, 1853)
Col. Insurance v. Force
8 How. Pr. 353 (New York Supreme Court, 1853)
Ladd v. Tudor
14 F. Cas. 923 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts, 1847)
Gardner v. Teller
2 How. Pr. 241 (New York Supreme Court, 1846)