Pixion, Inc. v. Citrix Systems, Inc.

Federal Circuit

Pixion, Inc. v. Citrix Systems, Inc.

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DecidedMarch 19, 2013

Docket12-1636

StatusUnpublished

This text of Pixion, Inc. v. Citrix Systems, Inc. (Pixion, Inc. v. Citrix Systems, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pixion, Inc. v. Citrix Systems, Inc., (Fed. Cir. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

PIXION, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

CITRIX SYSTEMS, INC., AND CITRIX ONLINE, LLC, Defendants-Appellees. ______________________

2012-1636 ______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 09-CV-3496, Judge Susan Y. Illston. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

COLBY B. SPRINGER, Lewis and Roca, LLP, of Mountain View California, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Of coun- sel was SHANE E. OLAFSON, of Phoenix, Arizona.

BLAIR M. JACOBS, McDermott Will & Emery, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief were SARAH CHAPIN COLUMBIA and LEIGH J. MARTINSON, of Boston, Massachusetts. Of counsel on the brief was TERRY W. AHEARN, of Menlo Park, Califor- nia. Of counsel was BRYAN KEITH JAMES, of Menlo Park, California. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, BRYSON, AND DYK, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

March 19, 2013 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI