Piwowarski v. Morgan

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 3, 2010·No. 09-2025·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-2025

JOHN F. PIWOWARSKI,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

FAYE MORGAN, Manager of Charles Town Towers,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. John Preston Bailey, Chief District Judge. (3:08-cv-00068-JPB-JES)

Submitted: February 5, 2010 Decided: March 3, 2010

Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John F. Piwowarski, Appellant Pro Se. Kirk H. Bottner, LAW OFFICE OF KIRK H. BOTTNER, Charles Town, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

John F. Piwowarski appeals from the district court's

order denying his motion to reopen his case. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. ∗ Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. Piwowarski v.

Morgan, No. 3:08-cv-00068-JPB-JES (N.D. W. Va. Aug. 31, 2009).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

∗ Because Piwowarski’s suit was dismissed without prejudice, Piwowarski may still refile his suit in the district court. As the district court has explained, Piwowarski must refile his suit as a new case and pay the appropriate fees. We express no opinion on the timeliness or merits of Piwowarski’s claims.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Piwowarski v. Morgan, (4th Cir. 2010).

Piwowarski v. Morgan (Piwowarski v. Morgan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.