Piwowarski v. Cornwell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Piwowarski v. Cornwell

247 A.D. 925

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 15, 1936

StatusPublished

This text of 247 A.D. 925 (Piwowarski v. Cornwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Piwowarski v. Cornwell, 247 A.D. 925 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment and order reversed on the law, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs, on the authority of St. Andrassy v. Mooney (262 N. Y. 368). All concur, except Sears, P. J., and Crosby, J., who dissent and vote for affirmance. (The judgment awarded damages for personal injuries in an automobile negligence action. The order denied a motion for a new trial on the minutes.) Present — Sears, P. J., Taylor, Edgcomb, Crosby and Lewis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order reversed on the law, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs, on the authority of St. Andrassy v. Mooney (262 N. Y. 368). All concur, except Sears, P. J., and Crosby, J., who dissent and vote for affirmance. (The judgment awarded damages for personal injuries in an automobile negligence action. The order denied a motion for a new trial on the minutes.) Present — Sears, P. J., Taylor, Edgcomb, Crosby and Lewis, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

247 A.D. 925, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/piwowarski-v-cornwell-nyappdiv-1936.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack