Pitz v. Town of Amherst Zoning Board of Appeals

198 A.D.2d 832, 605 N.Y.S.2d 1010
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 19, 1993·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted the petition and annulled the determination of respondent Town of Amherst Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA) that denied petitioner’s application for a building permit to construct a detached garage on his property. Under the circumstances of this case, respondent ZBA’s interpretation of the zoning ordinance, while entitled to deference, was arbitrary, unreasonable and irrational (see, Matter of Frishman v Schmidt, 61 NY2d 823, 825; Matter of Traveler Real Estate v Cain, 160 AD2d 1214, 1215; Gillen v Zoning Bd. of Appeals, 144 AD2d 433, 435, lv denied 73 NY2d 709; Matter of Frampton v Zoning Bd. of Appeals, 114 AD2d 670). We agree with Supreme Court that petitioner’s detached garage is a permitted accessory structure under the zoning ordinance. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Gorski, J. — Article 78.) Present— Callahan, J. P., Pine, Lawton, Doerr and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pitz v. Town of Amherst Zoning Board of Appeals, 198 A.D.2d 832, 605 N.Y.S.2d 1010 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

198 A.D.2d 832 (Pitz v. Town of Amherst Zoning Board of Appeals) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Turner v. Andersen
50 A.D.3d 1562 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
AA&L Associates, L. P. v. Casella
207 A.D.2d 1012 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)