Pitz v. Mujica Fashions, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Pitz v. Mujica Fashions, Inc.

201 So. 2d 795

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 15, 1967

DocketNo. 66-883

StatusPublished

This text of 201 So. 2d 795 (Pitz v. Mujica Fashions, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pitz v. Mujica Fashions, Inc., 201 So. 2d 795 (Fla. Ct. App. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is by the defendant, from a final judgment cancelling a lease upon the ground of mutual mistake of fact. Appellant urges that the evidence was insufficient to support the finding of fact made by the trial judge.

We affirm upon authority of the rule stated in Board of County Com’rs of Highlands County v. F. A. Sebring Realty Co., Fla.1953, 63 So.2d 256, 258; Carolina Lumber Company v. Daniel, Fla.App.1957, 97 So.2d 156; Abshier v. Etter, Fla.App.1958, 102 So.2d 853.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is by the defendant, from a final judgment cancelling a lease upon the ground of mutual mistake of fact. Appellant urges that the evidence was insufficient to support the finding of fact made by the trial judge.

We affirm upon authority of the rule stated in Board of County Com’rs of Highlands County v. F. A. Sebring Realty Co., Fla.1953, 63 So.2d 256, 258; Carolina Lumber Company v. Daniel, Fla.App.1957, 97 So.2d 156; Abshier v. Etter, Fla.App.1958, 102 So.2d 853.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

201 So. 2d 795, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pitz-v-mujica-fashions-inc-fladistctapp-1967.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack