Pitz v. Mujica Fashions, Inc.
201 So. 2d 795
Opinion
This appeal is by the defendant, from a final judgment cancelling a lease upon the ground of mutual mistake of fact. Appellant urges that the evidence was insufficient to support the finding of fact made by the trial judge.
We affirm upon authority of the rule stated in Board of County Com’rs of Highlands County v. F. A. Sebring Realty Co., Fla.1953, 63 So.2d 256, 258; Carolina Lumber Company v. Daniel, Fla.App.1957, 97 So.2d 156; Abshier v. Etter, Fla.App.1958, 102 So.2d 853.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pitz v. Mujica Fashions, Inc., 201 So. 2d 795 (Fla. Ct. App. 1967).
201 So. 2d 795 (Pitz v. Mujica Fashions, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Carolina Lumber Company v. Daniel
97 So. 2d 156 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1957)
Board of County Com'rs v. FA Sebring Realty Co.
63 So. 2d 256 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1953)
Abshier v. Etter
102 So. 2d 853 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1958)