Pitula v. Bobek

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Pitula v. Bobek

246 A.D. 684

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 15, 1935

StatusPublished

This text of 246 A.D. 684 (Pitula v. Bobek) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pitula v. Bobek, 246 A.D. 684 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. All concur, except Crosby, J., who dissents and votes for reversal on the law and for granting the motion. (The order denies a motion to dismiss the complaint in an action by building contractor of mortgagor against mortgagee to recover money received under fire insurance policy.) Present — Sears, P. J., Taylor, Edgeomb, Thompson and Crosby, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. All concur, except Crosby, J., who dissents and votes for reversal on the law and for granting the motion. (The order denies a motion to dismiss the complaint in an action by building contractor of mortgagor against mortgagee to recover money received under fire insurance policy.) Present — Sears, P. J., Taylor, Edgeomb, Thompson and Crosby, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

246 A.D. 684, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pitula-v-bobek-nyappdiv-1935.