Pitula v. Bobek

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Pitula v. Bobek

246 A.D. 684

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1935·Published

Opinion

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. All concur, except Crosby, J., who dissents and votes for reversal on the law and for granting the motion. (The order denies a motion to dismiss the complaint in an action by building contractor of mortgagor against mortgagee to recover money received under fire insurance policy.) Present — Sears, P. J., Taylor, Edgeomb, Thompson and Crosby, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. All concur, except Crosby, J., who dissents and votes for reversal on the law and for granting the motion. (The order denies a motion to dismiss the complaint in an action by building contractor of mortgagor against mortgagee to recover money received under fire insurance policy.) Present — Sears, P. J., Taylor, Edgeomb, Thompson and Crosby, JJ.

Pitula v. Bobek, 246 A.D. 684 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

246 A.D. 684 (Pitula v. Bobek) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.