Pittston Warehouse Corporation v. American Motorists Insurance Company C.A. Shea & Company, Inc.

954 F.2d 62, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 303, 1992 WL 3513
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedJanuary 13, 1992
Docket572, Docket 91-7727
StatusPublished
Cited by14 cases

This text of 954 F.2d 62 (Pittston Warehouse Corporation v. American Motorists Insurance Company C.A. Shea & Company, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pittston Warehouse Corporation v. American Motorists Insurance Company C.A. Shea & Company, Inc., 954 F.2d 62, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 303, 1992 WL 3513 (2d Cir. 1992).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from a judgment entered in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Sweet, J., granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment. In a prior ruling, the district court had determined that defendant-appellee American Motorists Insurance Co. (Amico) converted plaintiff-appellant Pittston Warehouse Corporation’s (Pittston) property. See Pittston Ware *63 house Corp. v. American Motorists Ins. Co., 715 F.Supp. 1221 (S.D.N.Y.1989). This appeal challenges the district court’s determination that Pittston was not entitled to additional interest, consequential or punitive damages or attorney’s fees as a result of the conversion.

Amico did not cross-appeal from the district court’s determination that a conversion occurred because Amico was not harmed by the final judgment. Amico does argue, however, as an additional reason why the district court was correct in not awarding any money damages that it did not convert Pittston’s property. We need not reach this issue because we conclude that additional interest, damages and attorney’s fees, if awarded, would have been inappropriate in this case. We reach this conclusion substantially for the reasons set forth in Judge Sweet’s opinion dated May 23, 1991. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.

Costs to the appellees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Siben v. American Airlines, Inc.
913 F. Supp. 271 (S.D. New York, 1996)
MTS, Inc. v. 200 East 87th Street Associates
899 F. Supp. 1180 (S.D. New York, 1995)
Industri & Skipsbanken A/S v. Levy
183 B.R. 58 (S.D. New York, 1995)
German v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.
885 F. Supp. 537 (S.D. New York, 1995)
Smith v. CONWAY ORGANIZATION, INC.
871 F. Supp. 196 (S.D. New York, 1994)
Garnier v. JC Penney Co., Inc.
863 F. Supp. 139 (S.D. New York, 1994)
Kinley Corp. v. Integrated Resources Equity Corp.
851 F. Supp. 556 (S.D. New York, 1994)
In Re Integrated Resources, Inc. Real Estate Lit.
851 F. Supp. 556 (S.D. New York, 1994)
Violette v. Armonk Associates, L.P.
849 F. Supp. 923 (S.D. New York, 1994)
Ehrlich v. Howe
848 F. Supp. 482 (S.D. New York, 1994)
Parke-Hayden, Inc. v. Loews Theatre Management Corp.
789 F. Supp. 1257 (S.D. New York, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
954 F.2d 62, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 303, 1992 WL 3513, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pittston-warehouse-corporation-v-american-motorists-insurance-company-ca-ca2-1992.