Pittston Chevrolet Sales Co. v. Felax
This text of 9 Pa. D. & C. 604 (Pittston Chevrolet Sales Co. v. Felax) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Luzerne County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff entered a judgment against the defendant upon a note containing a confession of judgment for $528 and directed a credit of $396, leaving a balance due of $132, for which amount an execution issued, together with an attorney’s commission of 15 per cent, upon the $528.
Defendant admits the amount due, contending that the attorney’s commission should be based upon the amount due at the time of the entry of the judgment and not upon the principal sum.
In Steel Iron Co. v. Jacobs, 9 Pa. Superior Ct. 122, it was held to be better practice to restrict attorneys’ commissions to the debt for which judgment is entered.
Whether the commission of 15 per cent, is excessive is not controverted; defendant is content if applied to the sum due.
Por the reasons herein given, the attorney’s commission is reduced to the basis of 15 per cent, upon $132.
From W. E. Woodruff, Wilkes-Barre, Pa.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
9 Pa. D. & C. 604, 1927 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 106, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pittston-chevrolet-sales-co-v-felax-pactcomplluzern-1927.