Pittson

Court of Claims

Pittson

506 F.2d 1406, 205 Ct. Cl. 842, 1974 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 55

CourtUnited States Court of Claims

DecidedOctober 25, 1974

DocketNo. 113-73

StatusPublished

This text of 506 F.2d 1406 (Pittson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pittson, 506 F.2d 1406, 205 Ct. Cl. 842, 1974 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 55 (cc 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

Civilian pay; dismissal. — Plaintiff, a veteran, was employed as a building guard at the United States Naval Radio Station, Oso, Wisconsin, from March 23, 1969 to July 22, 1971. On June 14,1971 plaintiff was notified of a proposal to remove him for four infractions of agency rules and regulations occurring during the preceding 16 months. The Civil Service 'Commission Board of Appeals and Review sustained plaintiff’s removal. On October 25,1974 the court issued the following order:

Before Davis, Judge, Presiding, Skeltoh and KuNzig, Judges.

[843]*843“This case comes before the court on defendant’s motion, filed January 21,1974, for summary judgment. Upon consideration thereof, together with the opposition thereto, without oral argument, on the basis of the decisions by this court in Angrisani v. United States, 172 Ct. Cl. 439 (1965), and Grover v. United States, 200 Ct. Cl. 337 (1973), it is concluded that plaintiif is not entitled to recover, and

“it is ordered that defendant’s said motion for summary judgment be and the same is granted and plaintiff’s petition is dismissed.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Civilian pay; dismissal. — Plaintiff, a veteran, was employed as a building guard at the United States Naval Radio Station, Oso, Wisconsin, from March 23, 1969 to July 22, 1971. On June 14,1971 plaintiff was notified of a proposal to remove him for four infractions of agency rules and regulations occurring during the preceding 16 months. The Civil Service 'Commission Board of Appeals and Review sustained plaintiff’s removal. On October 25,1974 the court issued the following order:

Before Davis, Judge, Presiding, Skeltoh and KuNzig, Judges.

[843]*843“This case comes before the court on defendant’s motion, filed January 21,1974, for summary judgment. Upon consideration thereof, together with the opposition thereto, without oral argument, on the basis of the decisions by this court in Angrisani v. United States, 172 Ct. Cl. 439 (1965), and Grover v. United States, 200 Ct. Cl. 337 (1973), it is concluded that plaintiif is not entitled to recover, and

“it is ordered that defendant’s said motion for summary judgment be and the same is granted and plaintiff’s petition is dismissed.”

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

506 F.2d 1406, 205 Ct. Cl. 842, 1974 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 55, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pittson-cc-1974.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack