Pittsman v. Luger

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Pittsman v. Luger

384 A.2d 1355, 253 Pa. Super. 301, 1978 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2785

CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedApril 13, 1978

DocketNo. 729

StatusPublished

This text of 384 A.2d 1355 (Pittsman v. Luger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pittsman v. Luger, 384 A.2d 1355, 253 Pa. Super. 301, 1978 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2785 (Pa. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

SPAETH, Judge:

This is an action in mandamus to compel appellants to reinstate appellee to a position with the Lackawanna County Department of Roads and Bridges.

Two settled requirements for mandamus are a clear legal right in the plaintiff, and a corresponding duty in the defendant. Garratt v. Philadelphia, 387 Pa. 442, 127 A.2d 738 (1956). Appellee argues that a duty was imposed on appellants by law in that, as a result of prior litigation between appellee’s union and appellants, the lower court on February 9, 1972, ordered that proceedings for reinstatement of all employees discharged since January 3, 1972,

* be undertaken by appellants under the provisions of a collective bargaining agreement in force between the union and appellants. As the existence of the February 9 order shows that appellee could have asked the lower court to find appellants in contempt of court for failing to comply with the order, and as mandamus does not lie if there exists an alternate remedy, Mullen v. Board of School Directors of DuBois Area School District, 436 Pa. 211, 259 A.2d 877 (1969); Goodman v. Meade, 162 Pa.Super. 587, 60 A.2d 577 (1948), the lower court had no jurisdiction over the subject matter of the suit, Kaelin v. University of Pittsburgh, 421 Pa. 220, 218 A.2d 798 (1966).

Accordingly, the lower court’s order is reversed, and the complaint is dismissed.

HOFFMAN, J., concurs in the result. CERCONE and VAN der VOORT, JJ., dissent and would affirm on the opinion of the lower court. WATKINS, former President Judge, did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Appellee was discharged on January 25, 1972.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SPAETH, Judge:

This is an action in mandamus to compel appellants to reinstate appellee to a position with the Lackawanna County Department of Roads and Bridges.

Two settled requirements for mandamus are a clear legal right in the plaintiff, and a corresponding duty in the defendant. Garratt v. Philadelphia, 387 Pa. 442, 127 A.2d 738 (1956). Appellee argues that a duty was imposed on appellants by law in that, as a result of prior litigation between appellee’s union and appellants, the lower court on February 9, 1972, ordered that proceedings for reinstatement of all employees discharged since January 3, 1972,

* be undertaken by appellants under the provisions of a collective bargaining agreement in force between the union and appellants. As the existence of the February 9 order shows that appellee could have asked the lower court to find appellants in contempt of court for failing to comply with the order, and as mandamus does not lie if there exists an alternate remedy, Mullen v. Board of School Directors of DuBois Area School District, 436 Pa. 211, 259 A.2d 877 (1969); Goodman v. Meade, 162 Pa.Super. 587, 60 A.2d 577 (1948), the lower court had no jurisdiction over the subject matter of the suit, Kaelin v. University of Pittsburgh, 421 Pa. 220, 218 A.2d 798 (1966).

Accordingly, the lower court’s order is reversed, and the complaint is dismissed.

HOFFMAN, J., concurs in the result. CERCONE and VAN der VOORT, JJ., dissent and would affirm on the opinion of the lower court. WATKINS, former President Judge, did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Appellee was discharged on January 25, 1972.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

384 A.2d 1355, 253 Pa. Super. 301, 1978 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2785, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pittsman-v-luger-pasuperct-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack