Pittsburgh Pipe & Supply Corp. v. Utley-Wheeler
Opinion
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION
PITTSBURGH PIPE & SUPPLY CORP., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 4:23 CV 959 RWS ) VIVIAN UTLEY-WHEELER, et al., ) ) Defendants. )
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
As plaintiff has unequivocally and affirmatively waived its right to raise any procedural defects to the removal of this action (ECF 11), this removed case is properly before the Court on diversity jurisdiction despite the fact that it was removed 31 days after service upon the removing defendant. See Pender v. Bell Asbestos Mines, LTD., 145 F. Supp. 2d 1107, 1110 (E.D. Mo. 2001) (28 U.S.C. § 1446(b) requires defendant to remove within thirty days after service of petition; however, § 1446(b) is not jurisdictional); Holbein v. TAW Enterprises, Inc., 983 F.3d 1049, 1053 (8th Cir. 2020) (nonjurisdictional defects in removal are waivable and do not deprive court of subject matter jurisdiction). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case will be set for a Rule 16 scheduling conference by separate Order.
Ww RODNEY W. SIPPEL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated this 8th day of August, 2023.
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pittsburgh Pipe & Supply Corp. v. Utley-Wheeler (Pittsburgh Pipe & Supply Corp. v. Utley-Wheeler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.