Pittsburgh Partners, Ltd. v. Accurate Cash Register, Inc.
412 So. 2d 46, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19717
Opinion
The default order under review 1 was erroneously entered after an answer had been filed and is consequently reversed. Fla.R. Civ.P. 1.500(c); Board of Regents v. Hardin, 393 So.2d 1134 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); Chester, Blackburn & Roder, Inc. v. Marchese, 383 So.2d 734 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Freedman v. Freedman, 235 So.2d 544 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970), cert. denied, 241 So.2d 859 (Fla.1970).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pittsburgh Partners, Ltd. v. Accurate Cash Register, Inc., 412 So. 2d 46, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19717 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).
412 So. 2d 46 (Pittsburgh Partners, Ltd. v. Accurate Cash Register, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Chester, Blackburn & Roder, Inc. v. Marchese
383 So. 2d 734 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Doctor's Hosp. of Hollywood, Inc. v. Madison
411 So. 2d 190 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1982)
BOARD OF REGENTS, ETC. v. Hardin
393 So. 2d 1134 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Freedman v. Freedman
235 So. 2d 544 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1970)