Pittsburgh Logistics v. Ceravaolo
This text of Pittsburgh Logistics v. Ceravaolo (Pittsburgh Logistics v. Ceravaolo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
PITTSBURGH LOGISTICS SYSTEMS, : No. 453 WAL 2017 INC., : : Petitioner : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Superior Court : v. : : : MICHAEL CERAVOLO, AN ADULT : INDIVIDUAL, MARY COLEMAN, AN : ADULT INDIVIDUAL, NATALIE : HENNINGS, AN ADULT INDIVIDUAL, : AND RACQUEL PAKUTZ, AN ADULT : INDIVIDUAL, : : Respondents :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 3rd day of April, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is
DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Pittsburgh Logistics v. Ceravaolo, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pittsburgh-logistics-v-ceravaolo-pa-2018.