Pittsburgh Forgings Co. v. Commissioner

2 T.C.M. 1080, 1943 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 33
CourtUnited States Tax Court
DecidedDecember 11, 1943
DocketDocket No. 111147.
StatusUnpublished

This text of 2 T.C.M. 1080 (Pittsburgh Forgings Co. v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Tax Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pittsburgh Forgings Co. v. Commissioner, 2 T.C.M. 1080, 1943 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 33 (tax 1943).

Opinion

Pittsburgh Forgings Company v. Commissioner.
Pittsburgh Forgings Co. v. Commissioner
Docket No. 111147.
United States Tax Court
1943 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 33; 2 T.C.M. (CCH) 1080; T.C.M. (RIA) 43506;
December 11, 1943

*33 A mortgage indenture dated October 1, 1932 provided that petitioner should declare or pay no dividends on its capital stock unless, at the time of declaration, its bonds should have been redeemed or otherwise cancelled in definite amounts set forth therein; and also that the dividends declared by petitioner should not exceed the amount of such bonds redeemed and retired during the year. Its net income for 1937 was about $500,000. Under a commitment to a bank it curtailed a loan and redeemed or retired none of its bonds. Held, that petitioner was actuated by sound business motives and is entitled to credit provided by section 26 (c) (1), Revenue Act of 1936.

H. A. Mihills, C.P.A., 917 Munsey Bldg., Washington, D.C., and R. K. Conaway, C.P.A., 2912 Grant Bldg., Pittsburgh, Pa., for the petitioner. W. J. McFarland, Esq., for the respondent.

VAN FOSSAN

Memorandum Findings of Fact and Opinion

The respondent determined a deficiency of $97,091.44 in the petitioner's income tax for the year 1937.

The issues are:

1. The correct amount of the petitioner's liability for income tax due and allocable to the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. The decision in the second issue will determine *34 such amount.

2. The allowance of the credit provided by section 26 (c) (1) of the Revenue Act of 1936 in the computation of the petitioner's surtax on undistributed profits.

Findings of Fact

Certain facts were stipulated and as so stipulated are adopted as findings of fact. The pertinent portions of such facts are as follows:

The petitioner is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, with its principal office and place of business located at Coraopolis, Pennsylvania. The petitioner filed its income and excess-profits tax return for the year 1937 with the collector of internal revenue for the Twenty-third District of Pennsylvania. It kept its books and made its income tax return for that year on the accrual basis.

On March 22, 1933 the petitioner entered into an indenture of mortgage dated October 1, 1932, with The Union Trust Company of Pittsburgh as trustee, for the authorized issue of First Mortgage 6% Gold Bonds of $1,000 denominations, in the principal amount of $446,000, but actually issued in the amount of $445,000. Four hundred twenty-one thousand dollars in principal amount of such First Mortgage 6% Gold Bonds, dated October 1, 1932, *35 were issued during the year 1933 in exchange for bonds of the same principal amount of a previous issue due April 1, 1938 and $24,000 in principal amount of the First Mortgage 6% Gold Bonds were issued during the year 1933 in payment of the balance owing on a land contract. The terms of this indenture were not altered prior to or during the year 1937.

Section 2, Article Second, and Section 1, Article Third, of the indenture are as follows:

Section 2. No dividend shall be declared or paid upon any capital stock of the Company of any class now or hereafter created, unless at the time of the declaration of such dividend the Company shall have redeemed or otherwise retired and cancelled First Mortgage Bonds aggregating at least $42,000 in principal amount, plus additional First Mortgage Bonds aggregating at least $21,000 in principal amount for each whole period of six months which shall have elapsed between October 1, 1932, and the date of the declaration of such dividend; and the total amount of dividends declared and paid in any calendar year by the Company, upon any and all classes of stock of the Company, whether heretofore or hereafter created, shall in no case be greater than*36 the aggregate principal amount of such First Mortgage Bonds as have been redeemed or otherwise retired and cancelled by the Company, theretofore during such calendar year.

* * * * *

Section 1. The Company shall and will, on or prior to the first day of April, in each year during the five-year period commencing with the year 1938 and ending with the year 1942, redeem and retire, or otherwise cause to be retired and cancelled, First Mortgage Bonds of a principal amount aggregating at least ten per cent of the aggregate principal amount of the First Mortgage Bonds which shall have remained outstanding and unpaid on March 31, 1938. The Company may secure the amount of First Mortgage Bonds requisite to enable it to comply with this covenant and may comply with this covenant, either by purchasing such bonds upon the open market and delivering them to the Trustee for cancellation, or by the payment of the redemption prices and by compliance with the conditions hereinafter, in Section 2 of this Article Third, provided and set forth.

On December 31, 1931 the petitioner held 5,267 shares of its capital stock in its treasury. These shares had been acquired prior to that date at cost of *37 $42,879.74. During the period from December 31, 1931 to December 31, 1937 the petitioner acquired 466 shares of its capital stock at the dates set forth below:

June 30, 1933232 shares
December 31, 193425 shares
May 31, 1935209 shares

On June 30, 1933 R. A. Mitchell and W. H. Stocking assigned to the petitioner 205 shares and 27 shares, respectively, of its capital stock from shares issued to then as a bonus on that date. The petitioner allowed credits of $614 and $82, respectively, to R. A. Mitchell and W. H. Stocking for these shares in payment of the balances of their personal accounts with the petitioner. The 25 shares, acquired on December 31, 1934, were acquired through the forfeiture of a subscription to purchase the stock from the petitioner by R. J. Koepp.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Page Oil Co. v. Commissioner
41 B.T.A. 952 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1940)
Maumee Malleable Castings Co. v. Commissioner
44 B.T.A. 263 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1941)
E. C. Atkins & Co. v. Commissioner
44 B.T.A. 441 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1941)
Dr. Pepper Bottling Co. v. Commissioner
45 B.T.A. 540 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1941)
Commissioner v. E. C. Atkins & Co.
127 F.2d 783 (Seventh Circuit, 1942)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 T.C.M. 1080, 1943 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 33, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pittsburgh-forgings-co-v-commissioner-tax-1943.