Pittsburgh & Connellsville R. R. v. Shaw
This text of 14 A. 323 (Pittsburgh & Connellsville R. R. v. Shaw) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
An examination of the report of the referee fails to reveal to us any error; on the contrary, the controversy seems to have been determined by him in a just and lawful manner.
The mistake made by the prothonotary in entering judgment on Sept. 3, 1887, affected the rights of neither of the parties, and that mistake seems not to have been regarded in the subsequent process, so that we cannot treat it now as at all material. If deemed material, the necessary amendment may be made in the court below.
Judgment affirmed. w. M. s., jr.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
14 A. 323, 2 Monag. 561, 1888 Pa. LEXIS 780, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pittsburgh-connellsville-r-r-v-shaw-pa-1888.