Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Elliott

38 Ind. 153
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 15, 1871
StatusPublished

This text of 38 Ind. 153 (Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Elliott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Elliott, 38 Ind. 153 (Ind. 1871).

Opinion

Downey, J.

This action was commenced by the appellee against the appellant and the Columbus, Chicago, and Indiana Central Railway Co., to recover the value of two mules alleged-to have been killed upon the Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, and St. Louis Railway, Columbus, Chicago, and Indiana Central division, Pan Handle route, where it was not fenced.

The defendants answered by general denial. There was a trial by jury, and a verdict for the plaintiff. A motion for a new trial by the Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, and St. Louis Railway Company, for the reasons that the verdict was not sustained by the evidence, and was contrary to law, was made and overruled. The defendant, The Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, and St. Louis Railway Company, excepted, and filed its bill of exceptions, putting the evidence in the record. Final judgment for the plaintiff The Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, and St. Louis Railway Company appealed, and has assigned for error the. overruling of the motion for a new trial. .The judgment appears to have been rendered against two corporations. Only one of them appeals, and perhaps under 2 G. & H. 270, sec. 551, the appeal should be dismissed as [154]*154irregularly taken; but we have examined the evidence in the bill of exceptions, and are of the opinion that it was sufficient to sustain the verdict of the jury, and, therefore, the judgment is affirmed, with five per cent, damages.

E. Walker, for appellant. M. Bell and A. S. Bell, for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
38 Ind. 153, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pittsburgh-cincinnati-st-louis-railway-co-v-elliott-ind-1871.