Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Ry. Co. v. Pritz

90 Ohio St. (N.S.) 419
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 1, 1914·No. No. 14331·Published

Opinion

Judgment reversed. See journal entry.

It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said court of appeals be, and the same hereby is, reversed; and coming now to render the judgment that the court of appeals should have [420]*420réñdered, it is hereby ordered' and adjudged jthat the judgment of the comrnon pleas court' in this action be, ¿ñd the súme hereby is, reversed for eftor. of, the court in its charge tó the jury'inThis tb-wit: “You have the right to reject any evidence, tüát yóü choose 'and consider only that which Appeals to yoür sense-Of justness and'fairnesS.”

Shauck, Donaiiue, Newman and WilkiN;5Jj./'’ concur. Nichols, C. J., and Wanamaker, J., dissent. . .

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Ry. Co. v. Pritz, 90 Ohio St. (N.S.) 419 (Ohio 1914).

90 Ohio St. (N.S.) 419 (Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Ry. Co. v. Pritz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.