Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Koehler
121 N.E. 84, 187 Ind. 728, 1918 Ind. LEXIS 96
Opinion
— The issues presented by this appeal are identical with those which were considered in Pittsburgh, etc., R. Co. v. Miller (1918), ante 684, 119 N. E. 801, and, on the authority of that decision, we hold in this case that the trial court erred in sustaining appellee’s demurrer to appellant’s fifth paragraph of answer.
Judgment reversed, with instructions to .overrule the demurrer to said fifth paragraph of answer, and for further proceedings not -inconsistent herewith.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Koehler, 121 N.E. 84, 187 Ind. 728, 1918 Ind. LEXIS 96 (Ind. 1918).
121 N.E. 84 (Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Koehler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gray v. Blankenbaker
121 N.E. 84 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1918)