Pittsburgh, C., C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. United States
257 F. 265, 168 C.C.A. 349, 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 2191
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·Decided January 7, 1919·No. No. 2508·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
This cause was tried in the District Court with No. 2507, Pennsylvania Co. v. United States, 257 Fed. 261, — C. C. A —, and the causes were hero argued together. Barring the fact that the shipments and switching charges which were the subject-matter of the controversy in the respective causes were different, the controlling facts and principles are identical. What we said in our opinion filed concurrently herewith in the Pennsylvania Case is alike applicable here.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pittsburgh, C., C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. United States, 257 F. 265, 168 C.C.A. 349, 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 2191 (7th Cir. 1919).
257 F. 265 (Pittsburgh, C., C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Schoonover v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America
245 N.W. 476 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1932)
Wood v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp.
41 F.2d 573 (Seventh Circuit, 1930)
Pilot Life Ins. Co. v. Owen
31 F.2d 862 (Fourth Circuit, 1929)
Kelly v. New England Mut. Life Ins.
32 F.2d 611 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1929)