Pittsburg, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Lightheiser
212 U.S. 560, 29 S. Ct. 688, 53 L. Ed. 652, 1908 U.S. LEXIS 1576
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided December 7, 1908·No. Nos. 141, 142, 178·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
Writs of error severally dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Tullis v. Lake Erie & Western R. R. Co., 175 U. S. 348, and cases cited; Pittsburg &c. Ry. Co. v. Lightheiser, 168 Indiana, 438; Same v. Collins, 168 Indiana, 467; and Same v. Ross, 80 N. E. Rep. 845.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pittsburg, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Lightheiser, 212 U.S. 560, 29 S. Ct. 688, 53 L. Ed. 652, 1908 U.S. LEXIS 1576 (1908).
212 U.S. 560 (Pittsburg, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Lightheiser) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Easterling Lumber Co. v. Pierce
64 So. 461 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1914)
Sonsmith v. Pere Marquette Railroad
138 N.W. 347 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1912)
Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Melton
218 U.S. 36 (Supreme Court, 1910)
Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago, & St. Louis Railway v. Lightheiser
212 U.S. 560 (Supreme Court, 1909)