Pittsburg, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Lightheiser
212 U.S. 560, 29 S. Ct. 688, 53 L. Ed. 652, 1908 U.S. LEXIS 1576
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedDecember 7, 1908
DocketNos. 141, 142, 178
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases
This text of 212 U.S. 560 (Pittsburg, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Lightheiser) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Pittsburg, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Lightheiser, 212 U.S. 560, 29 S. Ct. 688, 53 L. Ed. 652, 1908 U.S. LEXIS 1576 (1908).
Opinion
Writs of error severally dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Tullis v. Lake Erie & Western R. R. Co., 175 U. S. 348, and cases cited; Pittsburg &c. Ry. Co. v. Lightheiser, 168 Indiana, 438; Same v. Collins, 168 Indiana, 467; and Same v. Ross, 80 N. E. Rep. 845.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Easterling Lumber Co. v. Pierce
64 So. 461 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1914)
Sonsmith v. Pere Marquette Railroad
138 N.W. 347 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1912)
Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Melton
218 U.S. 36 (Supreme Court, 1910)
Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago, & St. Louis Railway v. Lightheiser
212 U.S. 560 (Supreme Court, 1909)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
212 U.S. 560, 29 S. Ct. 688, 53 L. Ed. 652, 1908 U.S. LEXIS 1576, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pittsburg-cincinnati-chicago-st-louis-railway-co-v-lightheiser-scotus-1908.