Pittsburg & Birmingham Traction Co. v. Monongahela Bridge Co.

39 A. 56, 184 Pa. 180, 1898 Pa. LEXIS 877
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 3, 1898·No. Appeal, No. 157·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Pee Curiam,

By agreement duly filed, trial by jury was dispensed with [188]*188•• and the decision of this case submitted to the court below under the provisions of the act of April 22, 1874, P. L. 109.

A careful consideration of the record has convinced us that the general conclusion reached by the learned president of the ■common pleas is correct, and hence there was no error in entering judgment in favor of the defendant. In any view that can be reasonably taken of the facts the plaintiff company was not - entitled to recover. We find nothing in any of the questions involved in the specifications of error that requires special no"tioe.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pittsburg & Birmingham Traction Co. v. Monongahela Bridge Co., 39 A. 56, 184 Pa. 180, 1898 Pa. LEXIS 877 (Pa. 1898).

39 A. 56 (Pittsburg & Birmingham Traction Co. v. Monongahela Bridge Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Point Bridge Co. v. Pittsburg & West End Railway Co.
79 A. 567 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1911)
Commonwealth v. Monongahela Bridge Co.
64 A. 909 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1906)