Pitts v. Youngblood

Supreme Court of Georgia

Pitts v. Youngblood

176 S.E.2d 58, 226 Ga. 564, 1970 Ga. LEXIS 596

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedJuly 9, 1970

Docket25875

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 176 S.E.2d 58 (Pitts v. Youngblood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pitts v. Youngblood, 176 S.E.2d 58, 226 Ga. 564, 1970 Ga. LEXIS 596 (Ga. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

Per curiam.

This appeal is from an equitable decree. The enumeration of errors was not filed within 20 days from the docketing of the case in this court as required by Court Rules 14 and 20. Since the appellant has failed to comply with these rules and no providential cause has been shown for such failure, the motion of the appellee to dismiss the appeal is granted.

Appeal dismissed.

All the Justices concur. Submitted June 8, 1970 Decided July 9, 1970. Jack W. Carter, for appellant. Stark & Stark, Homer M. Stark, for appellees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per curiam.

This appeal is from an equitable decree. The enumeration of errors was not filed within 20 days from the docketing of the case in this court as required by Court Rules 14 and 20. Since the appellant has failed to comply with these rules and no providential cause has been shown for such failure, the motion of the appellee to dismiss the appeal is granted.

Appeal dismissed.

All the Justices concur. Submitted June 8, 1970 Decided July 9, 1970. Jack W. Carter, for appellant. Stark & Stark, Homer M. Stark, for appellees.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

176 S.E.2d 58, 226 Ga. 564, 1970 Ga. LEXIS 596, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pitts-v-youngblood-ga-1970.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack