Pitts v. State

113 S.E. 67, 29 Ga. App. 51, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 48
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJuly 25, 1922
Docket13725
StatusPublished

This text of 113 S.E. 67 (Pitts v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pitts v. State, 113 S.E. 67, 29 Ga. App. 51, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 48 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The special "grounds of the motion for a new trial are merely elaborations of the general grounds; the verdict was amply authorized by the evidence, and the court did not err in refusing the grant of a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Luhe and Bloodworth, JJ., concur. L. L. Meadors, for plaintiff in error. W. Y. Atkinson, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
113 S.E. 67, 29 Ga. App. 51, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 48, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pitts-v-state-gactapp-1922.