Pitts v. State

178 S.E.2d 177, 226 Ga. 878, 1970 Ga. LEXIS 720
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedNovember 5, 1970
Docket26136
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 178 S.E.2d 177 (Pitts v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pitts v. State, 178 S.E.2d 177, 226 Ga. 878, 1970 Ga. LEXIS 720 (Ga. 1970).

Opinion

Undercoeler, Justice.

The appellant was convicted of armed robbery and sentenced to ten years imprisonment. He appeals from this judgment. Held:

1. Enumeration of error No. 1 complains that the line-up procedures violated the appellant’s constitutional rights because, “the police officer told the appellant that he would be placed in the line-up whether he had a lawyer or not.” There is no merit in this contention. The evidence shows that the appellant voluntarily, knowingly and intelligently waived lineup counsel both orally and in writing.

2. Enumeration of error No. 2 complains that the trial court erred in permitting the police officer who investigated the crime to testify as to his conversation with the manager of the finance company which was robbed. The manager was present at the time of the robbery. He related to the officer the manner in which the crime was perpetrated. Thereafter, the appellant was apprehended and arrested. There is no merit in this contention. The testimony was properly admitted for the limited purpose of explaining the officer’s conduct. Code § 38-302; Phillips v. State, 206 Ga. 418 (3) (57 SE2d 555). Furthermore, the manager and two other eyewitnesses also testified to these same facts and made positive in-court identifications of the appellant without objection. See Whippler v. State, 218 Ga. 198 (7) (126 SE2d 744); Massey v. State, 220 Ga. 883, 891 (142 SE2d 832); Cummings v. State, 226 Ga. 46 (3) (172 SE2d 395).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. *879 Glenn Zell, for appellant. Lewis R. Slaton, District Attorney, Tony H. Right, Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General, Harold N. Hill, Jr., Executive Assistant Attorney General, Marion 0. Gordon, William R. Childers, Jr., Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Carroll v. State
276 S.E.2d 267 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1981)
Harrell v. State
243 S.E.2d 890 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1978)
McAllister v. Brown
419 F. Supp. 588 (N.D. Georgia, 1976)
Barrow v. State
221 S.E.2d 416 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1975)
Teal v. State
214 S.E.2d 888 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1975)
Arnold v. State
211 S.E.2d 404 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1974)
House v. State
205 S.E.2d 217 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1974)
Watkins v. State
202 S.E.2d 442 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1973)
Rose v. State
196 S.E.2d 683 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1973)
Kent v. State
195 S.E.2d 770 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
178 S.E.2d 177, 226 Ga. 878, 1970 Ga. LEXIS 720, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pitts-v-state-ga-1970.