Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Pitts v. State

Pitts v. State

787 So. 2d 195, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 6638, 2001 WL 513892
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 16, 2001
DocketNo. 2D99-3912
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 787 So. 2d 195 (Pitts v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pitts v. State, 787 So. 2d 195, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 6638, 2001 WL 513892 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Clifton Pitts appeals his convictions for burglary of an unoccupied dwelling and criminal mischief. We see no reversible error and, therefore, affirm. The State cross-appeals from the trial court’s failure to impose a prison releasee reoffender sentence. We affirm based on the supreme court’s recent decision in State v. Huggins, 26 Fla. L. Weekly S174, — So.2d —, 2001 WL 278107 (Fla. Mar. 22, 2001) (holding that Prison Releasee Reoffender Punishment Act does not apply to burglary of an unoccupied dwelling).

Affirmed.

SALCINES and STRINGER, JJ„ Concur. BLUE, A.C.J., Concurs specially with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stabile v. State
790 So. 2d 1235 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
787 So. 2d 195, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 6638, 2001 WL 513892, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pitts-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.