Pitts v. State

365 So. 2d 1080, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 14122
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 9, 1979·No. No. 77-1642·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant seeks review of a summary denial of his motion pursuant to Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.850. We affirm.

The record proper clearly refutes the allegations of the motion and, therefore, the order appealed should be affirmed. See: Davis v. State, 277 So.2d 790 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973); Williams v. State, 296 So.2d 578 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974); Bohn v. State, 354 So.2d 1233 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pitts v. State, 365 So. 2d 1080, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 14122 (Fla. Ct. App. 1979).

365 So. 2d 1080 (Pitts v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bohn v. State
354 So. 2d 1233 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)
Davis v. State
277 So. 2d 790 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1973)
Williams v. State
296 So. 2d 578 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)