Pitts v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Pitts v. State

365 So. 2d 1080, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 14122

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 9, 1979

DocketNo. 77-1642

StatusPublished

This text of 365 So. 2d 1080 (Pitts v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pitts v. State, 365 So. 2d 1080, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 14122 (Fla. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant seeks review of a summary denial of his motion pursuant to Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.850. We affirm.

The record proper clearly refutes the allegations of the motion and, therefore, the order appealed should be affirmed. See: Davis v. State, 277 So.2d 790 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973); Williams v. State, 296 So.2d 578 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974); Bohn v. State, 354 So.2d 1233 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant seeks review of a summary denial of his motion pursuant to Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.850. We affirm.

The record proper clearly refutes the allegations of the motion and, therefore, the order appealed should be affirmed. See: Davis v. State, 277 So.2d 790 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973); Williams v. State, 296 So.2d 578 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974); Bohn v. State, 354 So.2d 1233 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

365 So. 2d 1080, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 14122, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pitts-v-state-fladistctapp-1979.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack