Pitts v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Pitts v. Smith

101 S.E. 917, 24 Ga. App. 700, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 469

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 27, 1920

Docket11037

StatusPublished

This text of 101 S.E. 917 (Pitts v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pitts v. Smith, 101 S.E. 917, 24 Ga. App. 700, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 469 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. Neither of the excerpts from the charge of the court complained of, when considered in the light of the entire charge and • the facts of the case, contains material error.

2. The 4th and 5th special grounds of the motion for a new trial are merely amplification of the usual general grounds. The verdict was authorized by the evidence, and the court did not err in refusing to grant a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Lulce and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, C. J.

1. Neither of the excerpts from the charge of the court complained of, when considered in the light of the entire charge and • the facts of the case, contains material error.

2. The 4th and 5th special grounds of the motion for a new trial are merely amplification of the usual general grounds. The verdict was authorized by the evidence, and the court did not err in refusing to grant a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Lulce and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

101 S.E. 917, 24 Ga. App. 700, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 469, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pitts-v-smith-gactapp-1920.