Pitts v. Phoebe Putney Memorial Hospital, Inc.
This text of 631 S.E.2d 830 (Pitts v. Phoebe Putney Memorial Hospital, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Following the dismissal of their suit against Phoebe Putney Memorial Hospital, Inc. (“Phoebe Putney”), Bonnie Pitts, Sam Farkas, and Bobby Kendricks, Sr., appeal, contending that the trial court erred in dismissing their claims for (1) breach of contract, (2) violation of the Georgia Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act, (3) unjust enrichment, (4) breach of fiduciary duty, and (5) declaratory and injunctive relief. Appellants’ claims stem from their allegation that Phoebe Putney, which operates a nonprofit hospital, charges uninsured patients more than it charges patients covered by insurance or Medicare or Medicaid. Upon a review of the record, we have determined that this case is not materially different from Cox v. Athens Regional Med. Center, 1 in which we affirmed the dismissal of identical claims made by similar plaintiffs. Therefore, we affirm the dismissal here.
Judgment affirmed.
Cox v. Athens Regional Med. Center, 279 Ga. App. 586 (631 SE2d 792) (2006).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
631 S.E.2d 830, 279 Ga. App. 637, 2006 Fulton County D. Rep. 1760, 2006 Ga. App. LEXIS 663, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pitts-v-phoebe-putney-memorial-hospital-inc-gactapp-2006.