Pitts v. Pennsylvania Railroad
This text of 129 A.D. 936 (Pitts v. Pennsylvania Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment and order reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event, unless the plaintiff, within twenty days, stipulates to reduce the verdict to the sum of §3,000, as of the date of the rendition thereof, [937]*937in which event the judgment is modified accordingly and as so modified is, together with the order, affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. All concurred, except ICruse, J., who dissented and voted for reversal, upon the ground that the trial judge erred in charging the jury that the defendant is liable if the accident was caused by the negligence of some one else or an employee of some other railroad company, and holding the defendant absolutely liable for such negligence. (Stoddard v. New York, New Haven & Hartford R. R. Co., 181 Mass. 422.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
129 A.D. 936, 115 N.Y.S. 1140, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pitts-v-pennsylvania-railroad-nyappdiv-1909.