Pitts v. . New York, Lake Erie and Western Railroad Co.
46 N.E. 1150, 152 N.Y. 623, 1897 N.Y. LEXIS 1005
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur, except Haight and Martin JJ., absent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pitts v. . New York, Lake Erie and Western Railroad Co., 46 N.E. 1150, 152 N.Y. 623, 1897 N.Y. LEXIS 1005 (N.Y. 1897).
46 N.E. 1150 (Pitts v. . New York, Lake Erie and Western Railroad Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Commonwealth v. Armour & Co.
87 S.E. 610 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1916)
Schuster v. Erie Railroad
145 A.D. 71 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1911)
Monck v. Brooklyn Heights Railroad
97 A.D. 447 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1904)
Woodworth v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad
55 A.D. 23 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1900)
Harper v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad
22 A.D. 273 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1897)