Pitts v. Florida Central & Peninsular Railroad
42 S.E. 383, 115 Ga. 1013, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 682
Opinion
1. After a plaintiff has closed his evidence and the court has granted a nonsuit, but before the order has been written or entered upon the minutes, a motion to reopen the case is addressed to the sound discretion of the court, and its refusal will not be interfered with by this court.
.2. Under the facts disclosed by the record, there was no error in granting a non-suit.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pitts v. Florida Central & Peninsular Railroad, 42 S.E. 383, 115 Ga. 1013, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 682 (Ga. 1902).
42 S.E. 383 (Pitts v. Florida Central & Peninsular Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wallace v. Yarbrough
270 S.E.2d 357 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1980)