Pitts v. Florida Central & Peninsular Railroad
This text of 42 S.E. 383 (Pitts v. Florida Central & Peninsular Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. After a plaintiff has closed his evidence and the court has granted a nonsuit, but before the order has been written or entered upon the minutes, a motion to reopen the case is addressed to the sound discretion of the court, and its refusal will not be interfered with by this court.
.2. Under the facts disclosed by the record, there was no error in granting a non-suit.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
42 S.E. 383, 115 Ga. 1013, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 682, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pitts-v-florida-central-peninsular-railroad-ga-1902.