Pitts v. Darby
This text of 62 So. 523 (Pitts v. Darby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Since the instrument purporting to be a testamentary disposition of lands in this state owned by Alex P. Brevard, a resident of North Carolina, was not attested by two witnesses, as required by Code, § 6172, to pass the title to real estate — a fact appearing upon the face of the record authenticated by the superior court of North Carolina, in which the instrument was probated, to the probate court of Lowndes county, Ala., in which the lands lie — the authority of Blacksher Co. v. Northrup, 176 Ala. 190, 57 South. 743, 12 L. R. A. (N. S.) 454, requires the affirmance of the decree sustaining the demurrers to the bill, with the result that the lands in this state descend under our statutes of descent and distribution, not affected by the testamentary instrument referred to before.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
62 So. 523, 182 Ala. 370, 1913 Ala. LEXIS 455, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pitts-v-darby-ala-1913.