Pitts v. Darby

62 So. 523, 182 Ala. 370, 1913 Ala. LEXIS 455
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided June 5, 1913·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

McCLELLAN, J.

Since the instrument purporting to be a testamentary disposition of lands in this state owned by Alex P. Brevard, a resident of North Carolina, was not attested by two witnesses, as required by Code, § 6172, to pass the title to real estate — a fact appearing upon the face of the record authenticated by the superior court of North Carolina, in which the instrument was probated, to the probate court of Lowndes county, Ala., in which the lands lie — the authority of Blacksher Co. v. Northrup, 176 Ala. 190, 57 South. 743, 12 L. R. A. (N. S.) 454, requires the affirmance of the decree sustaining the demurrers to the bill, with the result that the lands in this state descend under our statutes of descent and distribution, not affected by the testamentary instrument referred to before.

Affirmed.

Dowdell, C. J., and Sayre and Somerville, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pitts v. Darby, 62 So. 523, 182 Ala. 370, 1913 Ala. LEXIS 455 (Ala. 1913).

62 So. 523 (Pitts v. Darby) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lucas v. Kirk
151 So. 2d 744 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1963)
McCary v. Crumpton
103 So. 2d 714 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1958)
Walker v. Coley
88 So. 2d 868 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1956)
Case v. Conservation & Land Co.
53 So. 2d 562 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1951)
McCullough v. McCullough
24 So. 2d 123 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1945)
Hendley v. First Nat. Bank of Huntsville
180 So. 667 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1937)
Self v. Self
103 So. 591 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1925)
Wilkerson v. Sorsby
94 So. 481 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1922)
Spencer v. Hurd
77 So. 683 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1918)
Loper v. Dickey
67 So. 255 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1914)