Pitts, Phillip Merle

Texas Supreme Court·Decided June 25, 2015·No. PD-0750-15·Published

Opinion

PD-0750-15

RECEIVED IN

Return to: ©OUffTOFCRIMINAI APPEALS The 5th Court of Appeals at Dallas, Texas JUN2«2?tt

600 Commerce Street Dallas, Tx. 75202

05-13-01053-CR nn FILED IN UURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

IN THE 5TH

JUN2-2015

PHILLIP PITTS

vs.

COURT OF APPEALS^1 Acosta, Clerk

STATE OF TEXAS DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS

Pro se Motion for Extension of Time to File PDR To the Honorable Justices of Said Court:

On May 5, 2014, appellant's appointed counsel filed a brief in the above styled and numbered cause pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). On May 19, 2015 this Court rendered an opinion against this Appellant.

Phillip Pitts, appellant, desires to file a Pro Se Petition for Discretionary Review moves this court to provide him with an extension of time and notice that he is allowed to proceed Pro Se in order to be allowed access to the law library in my current Unit. I have been provided a copy of my record by Appellate Counsel. Appellant requests an extension oftime of60 days from the date he/she receives the grant to file a pro se response to counsel's Anders brief.

Respectfullv^submitted,

JUN 7Q2015 Pro se aerk> SB, Disztrict

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pitts, Phillip Merle, (Tex. 2015).

Pitts, Phillip Merle (Pitts, Phillip Merle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)