Pitts ex rel. Pitts v. Freeman

Eleventh Circuit

Pitts ex rel. Pitts v. Freeman

979 F.2d 1472

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided December 7, 1992·No. Nos. 88-8687, 88-8775·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

[1473] ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Before FAY, HATCHETT and DUBINA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

This matter is before us as a result of a remand from the Supreme Court. Freeman v. Pitts, 508 U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 1430, 118 L.Ed.2d 108 (1992). In accord with the Court’s opinion, we affirm the order of the district court entered on June 30, 1988 and remand the case for further proceedings consistent with that opinion.

The issues to be considered by the district court should include, but not necessarily be limited to, faculty and staff assignments (which may or may not involve a reexamination of student assignments), resource allocation, the quality of education being received by all students and the good faith commitment of the school district.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[1473] ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Before FAY, HATCHETT and DUBINA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

This matter is before us as a result of a remand from the Supreme Court. Freeman v. Pitts, 508 U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 1430, 118 L.Ed.2d 108 (1992). In accord with the Court’s opinion, we affirm the order of the district court entered on June 30, 1988 and remand the case for further proceedings consistent with that opinion.

The issues to be considered by the district court should include, but not necessarily be limited to, faculty and staff assignments (which may or may not involve a reexamination of student assignments), resource allocation, the quality of education being received by all students and the good faith commitment of the school district.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED for further proceedings.

Pitts ex rel. Pitts v. Freeman, 979 F.2d 1472 (11th Cir. 1992).

Pincite

979 F.2d 1472 (Pitts ex rel. Pitts v. Freeman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Willie Eugene Pitts, a Minor by His Mother and Next Friend, Mrs. Anna Mae Pitts, Victor Martin a Minor, by His Father and Next Friend Robert L. Martin Kelvin, Felicia, Alfred, Orma, and Alfredia Henderson, Minors, by Their Mother and Next Friend, Rebecca Henderson, Patricia Joyce Reeves, a Minor, by Her Mother and Next Friend, Mrs. Rosa Lee Reeves Anthony Reed and Cecilia Searcy, Minors, by Their Mother and Next Friend, Mrs. Juanita Searcy Ned and Becky Stone, Minors, by Their Father and Next Friend, Alfred E. Stone, Jr. Joy, Bridgett and Sandra Becker, Minors, by Their Father and Next Friend, Louis E. Becker Monica Rocker, a Minor, by Her Father and Next Friend, Arthur "Rock" Rocker John Johnson and Devett Smith, Minors, by Their Mother and Next Friend, Ms. Eunice A. Smith Frankie Prather, a Minor, by Guardian and Next Friend, Cynthia Scott, and Her Father and Next Friend, Major Scott Princess Mills, a Minor, by Her Father and Next Friend, Roger Mills Mark Anthony Wharton, a Minor, by His Mother and Next Friend Doris Patillar and All Others Similarly Situated, Cross-Appellees, Valencia Mills, Ashley and B'randi Armstrong, Plaintiffs-Intervenors v. Robert Freeman, Superintendent, Lyman Howard, Norma Travis, and Phil McGregor Dekalb County Board of Education Members, Cross-Appellants. Willie Eugene Pitts, Cross-Appellees, Valencia Mills, Ashley and B'randi Armstrong, Plaintiffs-Intervenors v. Robert R. Freeman, Cross-Appellants

979 F.2d 1472 (Eleventh Circuit, 1992)

Opinion

Related