Pitts & Cook v. Bomar

33 Ga. 96
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedAugust 15, 1861
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 33 Ga. 96 (Pitts & Cook v. Bomar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pitts & Cook v. Bomar, 33 Ga. 96 (Ga. 1861).

Opinion

By the Court

Lumpkin, J., delivering the opinion.

The Acts giving to masons and carpenters a lien on their work and materials found by them, for building and repairing houses, do not extend to the owners of mills, who furnish lumber. They must, to entitle themselves-to the benefit of the statutes, be actually masons or carpenters, and have contracted in that capacity or character.

In distribution of the steamboat fund in Augusta, decided at Savannah, a short time since, the same rule was applied to machinists. One of the Sehleys supplied a boiler for one of the boats, but not being a machinist, we held that he was not entitled to the lien secured to machinists. That case was precisely parallel to this.

Let the judgment be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

D. H. Overmyer Warehouse Co. v. W. C. Caye & Co.
157 S.E.2d 68 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1967)
Tipton Realty & Abstract Co. v. Kokomo Stone Co.
110 N.E. 688 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1915)
Caulfield v. Polk
46 N.E. 932 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1897)
Erath & Flynn v. R. K. Allen & Son
55 Mo. App. 107 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1893)
Farmers Loan & Trust Co. v. Canada & St. Louis Railway Co.
11 L.R.A. 740 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1891)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
33 Ga. 96, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pitts-cook-v-bomar-ga-1861.