Pitts & Cook v. Bomar
This text of 33 Ga. 96 (Pitts & Cook v. Bomar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Lumpkin, J., delivering the opinion.
The Acts giving to masons and carpenters a lien on their work and materials found by them, for building and repairing houses, do not extend to the owners of mills, who furnish lumber. They must, to entitle themselves-to the benefit of the statutes, be actually masons or carpenters, and have contracted in that capacity or character.
In distribution of the steamboat fund in Augusta, decided at Savannah, a short time since, the same rule was applied to machinists. One of the Sehleys supplied a boiler for one of the boats, but not being a machinist, we held that he was not entitled to the lien secured to machinists. That case was precisely parallel to this.
Let the judgment be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
33 Ga. 96, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pitts-cook-v-bomar-ga-1861.