Pittman v. Wade

Fourth Circuit

Pittman v. Wade

580 F. App'x 167

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 29, 2014·No. No. 14-6828·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Pernell Davis Pittman appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint for failure to prosecute. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Pittman v. Wade, No. 3:14-cv-00016-JAG (E.D.Va. May 15, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Pernell Davis Pittman appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint for failure to prosecute. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Pittman v. Wade, No. 3:14-cv-00016-JAG (E.D.Va. May 15, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Pittman v. Wade, 580 F. App'x 167 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

580 F. App'x 167 (Pittman v. Wade) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related