Pittman v. Wade

Fourth Circuit

Pittman v. Wade

580 F. App'x 167

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJuly 29, 2014

DocketNo. 14-6828

StatusPublished

This text of 580 F. App'x 167 (Pittman v. Wade) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pittman v. Wade, 580 F. App'x 167 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Pernell Davis Pittman appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint for failure to prosecute. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Pittman v. Wade, No. 3:14-cv-00016-JAG (E.D.Va. May 15, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Pernell Davis Pittman appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint for failure to prosecute. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Pittman v. Wade, No. 3:14-cv-00016-JAG (E.D.Va. May 15, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

580 F. App'x 167, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pittman-v-wade-ca4-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack