Pittman v. State

274 S.E.2d 114, 156 Ga. App. 108, 1980 Ga. App. LEXIS 2897
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Pittman v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 162 Ga. App. 51
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided October 15, 1980·No. 60562·Published

Opinion

Deen, Chief Judge.

The defendant was convicted of statutory rape of his eleven-year - old granddaughter. Evidence includes the defendant’s confession, the testimony of the child plus her further testimony that she had been forced into the relationship on other previous occasions, and the discovery that she had been infected with a venereal disease for which the appellant was being treated at the time of the alleged assault.

An appeal was filed on the general grounds following the overruling of the defendant’s motion for new trial. Appointed counsel has requested permission to withdraw from the case and states his opinion that no error of law appears. This court has independently examined the record and concurs. The requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U. S. 738 (87 SC 1396, 18 LE2d 493) and Bethay v. State, 237 Ga. 625 (229 SE2d 406) (1976) have been met. The request to withdraw is accordingly granted and the appeal is

Dismissed.

Birdsong and Sognier, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pittman v. State, 274 S.E.2d 114, 156 Ga. App. 108, 1980 Ga. App. LEXIS 2897 (Ga. Ct. App. 1980).

274 S.E.2d 114 (Pittman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Bethay v. State
229 S.E.2d 406 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1976)