Pittman v. State

138 S.E. 245, 36 Ga. App. 762, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 292
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 11, 1927
Docket18005
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 138 S.E. 245 (Pittman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pittman v. State, 138 S.E. 245, 36 Ga. App. 762, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 292 (Ga. Ct. App. 1927).

Opinion

Bloodworm, J.

This is a ease of circumstantial evidence. The jury were instructed that “the proven facts and circumstances must not only be consistent with the hypothesis of guilt, but must exclude every reasonable hypothesis, save the guilt of the accused.” The evidence was sufficient to satisfy the jury of the guilt of the accused. The trial judge, who, like the jury, saw the witnesses and heard their testimony, approved the verdict. This court can not say that the verdict was unauthorized.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bethel Farm Bureau v. Anderson
123 S.E.2d 754 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1962)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
138 S.E. 245, 36 Ga. App. 762, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 292, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pittman-v-state-gactapp-1927.