Pittman v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Pittman v. State

268 So. 3d 946

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 22, 2019

DocketNo. 1D17-3574

StatusPublished

This text of 268 So. 3d 946 (Pittman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pittman v. State, 268 So. 3d 946 (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Christopher Pittman appeals his convictions for trafficking in cocaine (400 grams or more) and trafficking in methamphetamine (200 grams or more) arguing the trial court erred in denying his motions for mistrial. Each of his two motions sought a mistrial for improper testimony. We find no abuse of discretion in the denial of the respective motions as neither instance of *947allegedly improper testimony vitiated the entire trial. See England v. State , 940 So.2d 389 (Fla. 2006).

Accordingly, the convictions are AFFIRMED .

Wolf, Bilbrey, and Winsor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Christopher Pittman appeals his convictions for trafficking in cocaine (400 grams or more) and trafficking in methamphetamine (200 grams or more) arguing the trial court erred in denying his motions for mistrial. Each of his two motions sought a mistrial for improper testimony. We find no abuse of discretion in the denial of the respective motions as neither instance of *947allegedly improper testimony vitiated the entire trial. See England v. State , 940 So.2d 389 (Fla. 2006).

Accordingly, the convictions are AFFIRMED .

Wolf, Bilbrey, and Winsor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

268 So. 3d 946, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pittman-v-state-fladistctapp-2019.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack