Pittman v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Pittman v. State

268 So. 3d 946

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 22, 2019·No. No. 1D17-3574·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Christopher Pittman appeals his convictions for trafficking in cocaine (400 grams or more) and trafficking in methamphetamine (200 grams or more) arguing the trial court erred in denying his motions for mistrial. Each of his two motions sought a mistrial for improper testimony. We find no abuse of discretion in the denial of the respective motions as neither instance of *947allegedly improper testimony vitiated the entire trial. See England v. State , 940 So.2d 389 (Fla. 2006).

Accordingly, the convictions are AFFIRMED .

Wolf, Bilbrey, and Winsor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Christopher Pittman appeals his convictions for trafficking in cocaine (400 grams or more) and trafficking in methamphetamine (200 grams or more) arguing the trial court erred in denying his motions for mistrial. Each of his two motions sought a mistrial for improper testimony. We find no abuse of discretion in the denial of the respective motions as neither instance of *947allegedly improper testimony vitiated the entire trial. See England v. State , 940 So.2d 389 (Fla. 2006).

Accordingly, the convictions are AFFIRMED .

Wolf, Bilbrey, and Winsor, JJ., concur.

Pittman v. State, 268 So. 3d 946 (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

268 So. 3d 946 (Pittman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related