Pittman v. State

210 So. 3d 73, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 10331
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 6, 2016
DocketNo. 2D16-307
StatusPublished

This text of 210 So. 3d 73 (Pittman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pittman v. State, 210 So. 3d 73, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 10331 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See State v. Hackley, 95 So.3d 92 (Fla.2012); State v. Cotton, 769 So.2d 345 (Fla.2000); Pittman v. State, 160 So.3d 429 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015) (table decision); Harris v. State, 777 So.2d 994 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000).

SILBERMAN, WALLACE, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Harris v. State
777 So. 2d 994 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
State v. Cotton
769 So. 2d 345 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)
State v. Hackley
95 So. 3d 92 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
210 So. 3d 73, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 10331, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pittman-v-state-fladistctapp-2016.