Pittman v. State

595 So. 2d 1101, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 3319, 1992 WL 57882
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 25, 1992·No. No. 91-00943·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Davis v. State, 528 So.2d 521 (Fla. 2d DCA), review denied, 536 So.2d 243 (Fla.1988). We recognize that our decision in Davis is in conflict with Lang v. State, 566 So.2d 1354 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990).

DANAHY, A.C.J., and PATTERSON, J., concur. PARKER, J., concurs specially.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pittman v. State, 595 So. 2d 1101, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 3319, 1992 WL 57882 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

595 So. 2d 1101 (Pittman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pittman v. State
620 So. 2d 1232 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1993)
Croskey v. State
601 So. 2d 1326 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)