Pittman v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

137 A.3d 572, 635 Pa. 418, 2016 WL 2975241, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 1047
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 23, 2016·No. 90 MAL 2016 (Granted)·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 23rd day of May, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

Did the Parole Board abuse its discretion by summarily denying petitioner credit against his maximum sentence for time that he spent at liberty on parole following his recom-mitment as a convicted parole violator?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pittman v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole, 137 A.3d 572, 635 Pa. 418, 2016 WL 2975241, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 1047 (Pa. 2016).

137 A.3d 572 (Pittman v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

V.J. Carroll v. PPB
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2024
Pittman v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole
159 A.3d 466 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2017)
R.S. Riede v. PA BPP
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2017
M. Seward v. PA BPP
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2017
A. Sharpe v. PBPP
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2016