Pittman v. Hunt Construction Group

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 21, 2009
Docket08-1817
StatusUnpublished

This text of Pittman v. Hunt Construction Group (Pittman v. Hunt Construction Group) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pittman v. Hunt Construction Group, (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-1817

EDDIE LAREECE PITTMAN,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

HUNT CONSTRUCTION GROUP, (in care of CEO Robert G. Hunt), in its official capacity,

Defendant – Appellee,

and

CHRIS ARMSTRONG, Manager for Hunt Project in Chapel Hill, in his official capacity; BILLY STEWARD, Superintendent of Hunt Project in Chapel Hill, in his official capacity,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (4:07-cv-00001-D)

Submitted: January 15, 2009 Decided: January 21, 2009

Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eddie LaReece Pittman, Appellant Pro Se. Nicole A. Crawford, BROOKS, PIERCE, MCLENDON, HUMPHREY & LEONARD, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Eddie LaReece Pittman appeals the district court’s

order denying relief on his civil action alleging employment

discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act

of 1964, as amended. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. Pittman v. Hunt Constr. Group, No. 4:07-

cv-00001-D (E.D.N.C. June 26, 2008). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Pittman v. Hunt Construction Group, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pittman-v-hunt-construction-group-ca4-2009.